|
I Saw Ramallah
By Mourid Barghouti
The American University
in Cairo Press
184 pages, $19.95
Israel has denied Palestinians many things over
the years besides self-determination and the right
of return: water rights and building permits,
economic development and freedom of movement. In all
of this, the diplomatic and financial support of the
United States has been crucial and, particularly in
America, Palestinians have also lacked something
else--"permission to narrate," in Edward Said's
phrase. Here the story of Israel generally belongs
to its boosters, even if this means the suppression
of inconvenient facts and the virtual exclusion of
Palestinian writers from the mainstream.
This is the context in which poet Mourid
Barghouti's memoir appears, if appears is the
|

|
|
Barghouti came back to an occupied
Ramallah.
JIM
HOLLANDER/REUTERS ARCHIVES |
word. Barghouti, born in a village outside of
Ramallah, was studying in Cairo when the Six Day War
broke out. Thus when Israel conducted a census of
its subject population and Barghouti, along with
many others, was not there to be counted, he lost
his right to return. Only in 1996, after 30 years of
exile, did Barghouti receive a temporary reunion
permit.
I Saw Ramallah is the account of his
homecoming to an occupation. Published in English in
January, this humane and eloquent book, which won
the 1997 Naguib Mahfouz Medal and enjoys the
ostensible good fortune of topicality and a fine
translation, has been ignored outside of
publications specializing in the Middle East. Such
omissions are worth noting when we are probably
about to receive, from those possessing the
permission to narrate, a somewhat redundant lesson
in the politics of language.
"When the history of our era is written," writes
Martin Peretz in his own New Republic,
"terror will be seen as the Palestinians'
distinctive contribution to modern politics." Never
mind for now that the founding fathers of Israel,
like those of Ireland and Algeria and many other
post-colonial nations, were terrorists in the
strictest sense of the term. The immediate
consequence of using terrorists to symbolize
Palestinians may soon be to license, in the words of
the Jerusalem Post, "eliminating the
Palestinian Authority and reoccupying
Palestinian-controlled territory."
Ariel Sharon just concluded a listening tour of
the United States and Britain, looking for
reassurance this will be all right with everyone.
Resemblances to the early summer of 1982, before the
"Peace for Galilee" invasion of Lebanon began, are
unmistakable: Sharon is back in power and again
looking for a cease-fire to break rather than hold.
As the Israeli journalist Uri Avneri wrote in August
of that year, the "original sin" of his colleagues
was to use the word mehablim, or "terrorist,"
for "all PLO fighters" and ultimately for "the whole
of the Palestinian people."
It is unfortunate to use up so much of a review
before discussing the book itself, but war dwarfs
all books. Besides, one of the special virtues of
Barghouti's book is its modesty. In a region
blighted by competing versions of The Book,
Barghouti has been content to write what is merely a
book. I Saw Ramallah is fractured,
provisional and honest; its last sentence,
fittingly, is a question. More than this, Barghouti
has an aversion to the symbols that are the
intellectual currency of war and occupation: "All
conflicts prefer symbols. Jerusalem is now the
Jerusalem of theology. The world is concerned with
... the idea and the myth of Jerusalem, but our
lives in Jerusalem and the Jerusalem of our lives do
not concern it."
But it is not only Israeli irredentism that
relies on symbols. Exile from their homeland makes
Palestinians susceptible to myth-making as well,
forcing them to "adore an unknown beloved." When
Barghouti crosses into the West Bank for the first
time in three decades, he discovers a country not
nearly so green as he remembered it. He looks at the
land and asks himself, "What is so special about it
except that we have lost it?" And while he is happy
to return, as his brother who died in Jordan was
never allowed to do, it does not gratify him that
some things are just as they were: "The Occupation
forced us to remain with the old. ... It did not
deprive us of the clay ovens of yesterday, but of
the mystery of what we would invent tomorrow."
I Saw Ramallah is a rare memoir,
anti-nostalgic and unromantic. Part of its charm is
that Barghouti, by nature an unpolitical man, wishes
it could also be without politics. Even when on a
march he can't bring himself to shout slogans, and
he prefers to all symbolism "the scent of dark
coffee and cardamom coming from the dark end of the
guesthouse wall." But with most Palestinians living
either under occupation or as refugees, politics are
inescapable, entering "into the most miniature
details of the souls of our men and our women." I
Saw Ramallah is best at illustrating the
fearsome extent of the occupation--an occupation not
only of land, but finally of thoughts and gestures.
And, of course, of the storyline. Barghouti's
often funny book--he belittles the noble etymologies
of his surname and concludes that it must be derived
from al-barghout, or "the flea"--is
strikingly free of anger. This makes its single cry
the more telling: "The Israelis occupy our homes as
victims and present us to the world as killers." It
seems likely that large numbers of the "killers" are
about to get killed.
"Sharon Visit Will Pitch Retaliation," ran a
headline in the June 25 Los Angeles Times.
This pitch might be a harder sell here if
Palestinians more often got to speak for themselves.
As it is, desperate young men in the occupied
territories are not altogether wrong in feeling
that, as far as we are concerned, they are most
eloquent as corpses.
Benjamin Kunkel has written for The
Nation, Dissent and other publications.
|